Thursday, May 14, 2015

DeflateGate and Other Thursday Thoughts

A few Thursday Thoughts:

DeflateGate


Given that I posted my HateGate article last year, people have been asking me what I now think about DeflateGate.  I've deflected by saying, "What's the big deal?  My wife's been deflating my balls for years."  Even though its not true, it makes for a good chuckle...feel free to use it whenever you tell a Patriot hater you're from New England.

But the truth is that I don't know what to think.  As I wrote to my cousin, Dave, I don’t know what Brady knew, but the report saying that “it is likely” he was “generally aware of… inappropriate activities” is not exactly a smoking gun.  It seems that, and Ted Wells recent statements confirmed it, Brady is being punished more for his lack of cooperation with the investigation than for anything he might have done.  I don’t know how cooperative I’d be with someone who is questioning my integrity, but I do know that there have been times in my life when it was likely that I was generally aware of inappropriate activities, yet I didn’t feel like I had done anything wrong. So, let’s wait and see where it all ends up, after the appeal.

Lemons
If I ever want someone to do PR for something, I'm going to find the people who work for the citrus industry.  After all, those damned lemons are everywhere.  It started with fish and seafood, and then went to sparkling water, and now it's hard to get a plain old glass of water without a lemon in it.  Even when I order tea with milk, they still bring a lemon (do they bother to consider what lemon juice does to milk?).  I almost expect to walk into a men's room and find lemons in the urinal.  Hmmm...maybe that's what I should do with the lemons I'm not using.

"Safe" Drivers

Truthfully, I don't like driving behind minivans, Priuses (Prii?) and Subaru wagons.  They almost always drive slower than the situation calls for, in the mistaken impression that they're driving safely.  I guess they don't consider the lack of safety when the rest of us swerve around to try to pass them.

K-Cups

I really like the convenience of a Keurig machine for making coffee (which Joni drinks) and tea (which I drink), but I've been told that the K-Cups are not recyclable because they combine plastic and foil.  Why can't someone make K-cups with plastic on top instead of foil?  In any event, here's what I do...I bought several EZ-Cups, which are reusable shells, and the paper filters that go into them.  I then fill them with my favorite tea in whatever strength I want (I generally prefer strong tea), and I brew a cup.  Sure, it takes a few more minutes, but it tastes better and helps stop the oceans from filling up with plastic.

AOL

My email account has been on AOL for 30 years, and the media routinely portrays that as out of touch with today's reality.  So, I was happy to read that Verizon purchased AOL recently for $4.4 billion.  I guess I feel suddenly relevant.

More thoughts to follow...

Friday, February 20, 2015

Reid's 2015 Oscar Preview

For the last few years, I've been writing an article similar to one in the Boston Globe in which critics preview the Academy Awards, using 4 categories:  “Will Win,” “Should Win,” “Shouldn’t Be Here,” and “Was Robbed.”  They follow each with a paragraph about the races.   I used the same format to preview eight categories of the 2015 Academy Awards (movies from 2014).

Best Picture

The Nominees: "American Sniper," "Birdman," "Boyhood," "The Grand Budapest Hotel," "The Imitation Game," "Selma," "The Theory of Everything," "Whiplash" 
Will Win: “Boyhood”
Should Win: “The Imitation Game”
Shouldn’t Be Here: “The Theory of Everything”
Was Robbed:  “Interstellar” 

"Boyhood" is an excellent movie, but it will win for the wrong reason...because of the way it was made, over the course of 12 years.  Granted, the results are unlike what most traditional movies can achieve, but the script and story line are not so interesting and innovative as to award it all the acclaim it is receiving.  If there was an award for "Most Committed Moviemaking Project," "Boyhood" should win hands down, but it is not as good a film as "The Imitation Game."

Best Actor

The Nominees:
  • Steve Carell in "Foxcatcher"
  • Bradley Cooper in "American Sniper"
  • Benedict Cumberbatch in "The Imitation Game"
  • Michael Keaton in "Birdman"
  • Eddie Redmayne in "The Theory of Everything"
Will Win: Eddie Redmayne in "The Theory of Everything"
Should Win: Michael Keaton in "Birdman"
Shouldn’t Be Here: Steve Carell in "Foxcatcher"
Was Robbed:  Jake Gyllenhaal in "Nightcrawler"

It seems like almost every year, the Academy gives its best acting awards to actors who play characters who are either famous people or have some sort of affliction; these roles are designed for Oscar, and this year, two such performances will win--those of Eddie Redmayne (who plays a famous person with an affliction) and Julianne Moore.  Granted, they each did an outstanding job, but I wish the voters would be brave enough to give the awards to more nuanced performances, like the one given by Michael Keaton this year.  Otherwise, Steve Carell is nominated for his makeup, not for his painfully boring performance, especially when compared with Jake Gyllenhaal's amazing turn as a creepy newshound in "Nightcrawler."

Best Actress

The Nominees:
  • Marion Cotillard in "Two Days, One Night"
  • Felicity Jones in "The Theory of Everything"
  • Julianne Moore in "Still Alice"
  • Rosamund Pike in "Gone Girl"
  • Reese Witherspoon in "Wild"
Will Win: Julianne Moore in "Still Alice"
Should Win: Reese Witherspoon in "Wild"
Shouldn’t Be Here: Rosamund Pike in "Gone Girl"
Was Robbed:  Agata Trzebuchowska in "Ida"

Ditto to my complaint regarding the Best Actor category.  Here, Julianne Moore will win because of the part, not because her acting was any better than that of Reese Witherspoon, who already won this award for her less interesting performance in 2005's "Walk the Line."  And how Rosamund Pike was nominated for her wooden performance in "Gone Girl" is a complete mystery.

Best Director

The Nominees:
  • Alejandro Iñárritu for "Birdman"
  • Richard Linklater for "Boyhood"
  • Bennett Miller for "Foxcatcher"
  • Wes Anderson for "The Grand Budapest Hotel"
  • Morten Tyldum for "The Imitation Game"
Will Win: Richard Linklater for "Boyhood"
Should Win: Richard Linklater for "Boyhood"
Shouldn’t Be Here: Bennett Miller for "Foxcatcher"
Was Robbed:  Joon-ho Bong for "Snowpiercer"

This is where "Boyhood" should be most honored.  Richard Linklater's commitment to this excellent and difficult project deserves all the accolades it can get.  On the other hand, Bennett Miller's unfathomable lack of pacing should win for "Worst Director."  And Joon-ho Bong should be given some credit for making viewers suspend disbelief while creating multiple thrills in the absurd but highly watchable "Snowpiercer."

Best Supporting Actor

The Nominees:
  • Robert Duvall in "The Judge"
  • Ethan Hawke in "Boyhood"
  • Edward Norton in "Birdman"
  • Mark Ruffalo in "Foxcatcher"
  • J.K. Simmons in "Whiplash"
Will Win: J.K. Simmons in "Whiplash"
Should Win: J.K. Simmons in "Whiplash"
Shouldn’t Be Here: none
Was Robbed:  Bill Nighy in "Pride"

This category got it right.  These were five very good performances, and I only wish there had been space for Nighy's excellently understated role in "Pride."  On any other year, Norton would likely win for his manically brilliant comedic performance in "Birdman," but this year's best performance in any role in any movie belonged to Simmons, as the manipulative bandleader in "Whiplash."  It will go down as one of the all-time great roles.

Best Supporting Actress

The Nominees:
  • Patricia Arquette in "Boyhood"
  • Laura Dern in "Wild"
  • Keira Knightly in “The Imitation Game”
  • Emma Stone in "Birdman"
  • Meryl Streep in "Into the Woods"
Will Win: Patricia Arquette in "Boyhood"
Should Win: Patricia Arquette in "Boyhood"
Shouldn’t Be Here: Meryl Streep in "Into the Woods"
Was Robbed:  Minnie Driver in "Beyond the Lights"

I've always liked the acting of Patricia Arquette, but even I was surprised by the depth and breadth of this performance as the mom in "Boyhood."  And just because Meryl Streep is the best living movie actress should not guarantee her an annual Oscar nomination, certainly not over Minnie Driver's excellent role as a misguided stage mother in "Beyond the Lights."

Best Adapted Screenplay

The Nominees:
  • Jason Hall for "American Sniper"
  • Graham Moore for "The Imitation Game"
  • Paul Thomas Anderson for "Inherent Vice"
  • Anthony McCarten for "The Theory of Everything"
  • Damien Chazelle for "Whiplash"
Will Win: Graham Moore for "The Imitation Game"
Should Win: Graham Moore for "The Imitation Game"
Shouldn’t Be Here: Jason Hall for "American Sniper"
Was Robbed:  Nick Hornby for "Wild"

"The Imitation Game" was the year's best film, but this is likely to be its only major award, which is unfortunate.  Otherwise, "American Sniper" is vastly overrated, while Nick Hornby's script for "Wild" really brought Cheryl Strayed's journey to life.

Best Original Screenplay

The Nominees:
  • Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr. and Armando Bo for "Birdman"
  • Richard Linklater for "Boyhood"
  • E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman for "Foxcatcher"
  • Wes Anderson for "The Grand Budapest Hotel"
  • Dan Gilroy for "Nightcrawler"
Will Win: Wes Anderson for "The Grand Budapest Hotel"
Should Win: Wes Anderson for "The Grand Budapest Hotel"
Shouldn’t Be Here: E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman for "Foxcatcher"
Was Robbed: Jonathan and Christopher Nolan for "Interstellar"

This one is close between "Birdman" and "Budapest," with the nod going to Wes Anderson for the inventive weirdness for which he is known.  I'm not sure how they ignored the screenplay for "Interstellar," which successfully explored themes first described by Einstein and Hawking while making them accessible to the common moviegoer.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Rubbers, Cruise Control, and Dinosaurs

I was driving Joni to work this morning, and I turned to her and asked, "Do kids still wear rubbers?"  I thought it was an innocent question, but it garnered a look of disbelief.

Realizing she was envisioning something completely different, I refreshed her memory to when we were both young and most shoes were made from leather.  In order to protect them on snowy, slushy days like today, our parents would make us cover them with rubber sheathes in the shape of shoes...they were called "rubbers."  Fortunately, she remembered and told me they are now referred to as "galoshes," which I remembered as tall, uncomfortable, rubber boots with peculiar but effective metal clamps used to close them.  Joni said that they also still exist, but now all the footwear in that category is referred to as galoshes.  I looked online to learn that she is right.  Of course, I grew up long before Gore-Tex® or fashionable winter boots, which made me realize that at 61, I'm getting old.

After all, I remember a time when Boston had only two TV stations (ABC had yet to expand here), before the AFL (now the AFC of the NFL) was founded,  before color TV, before plastic bags, and when gasoline was 30 cents a gallon and attendants would wash both windshields, check your oil, and give you Green Stamps (or sometimes actual gifts like dishes or glasses).

Of course, there were no computers, and electric typewriters were very expensive, so must of us used manual typewriters (the lower case "L" took the place of the number 1, which did not exist on the limited keyboard).  The closest most of us came to "technology" was drinking Tang, which, as everyone knew, was invented for the space program.

I've seen every Super Bowl (on TV of course), and I still use cruise control on the highway.  This last revelation might seem a bit odd, but I've noticed that with all the hybrids, most highway drivers these days try to save fuel by keeping their foot on the gas pedal at about the same level of depression, no matter what the incline.  This leads them to slow down as they drive uphill and speed up on the way downhill, which is very frustrating when you are trying to stick to a consistent speed (as when using cruise control).

If you're in my generation, you've likely seen the emails pointing out things that we remember that those young'uns don't.  You can reminisce about a time when plastic was rare, vinyl was used for records, and most things were made from metal, glass, or wood.  It saddens us that only two cast members from "Gilligan's Island" are still alive, and that if you were a boy back then, you likely had the hots for one of them--Tina Louise (Ginger) or Dawn Wells (Mary Ann).  It's further dismaying to know that Louise is now 79 and Wells is 75.  Fortunately, Betty and Veronica never aged.

But we are beginning to become dinosaurs, and the ice age approaches (if you look outside my window today, you might think it's already here).  We have moved into an era when our lives are digitized and online for all to see, and our identities are under a constant barrage of theft and hacking.  We can choose which aspects of modern culture we embrace...I'm writing a blog and posting on Facebook, but I refuse to "tweet" or engage in cyberspeak, and I don't trust the cloud.

You may be incensed at being referred to in this way, thinking that you are in your prime, but that's like saying that Nixon didn't know about Watergate.  If you're old enough to remember that reference, you're likely past your physical prime.  Personally, I take pride in knowing that I'm still standing and getting enjoyment from modern music, movies, and technology.  I wear my dinosaur badge proudly (sometimes keeping it in my wallet next to my AARP card).

In 30 years, Gavin may recall an era of VCRs, cars that ran on gasoline, and airports that didn't look like a scene from "Total Recall," where passengers were treated like people, rather than potential terrorists.  But for now, he has to yield the dinosaur throne, which I sit in proudly as I lean back and set the cruise control.
 

Monday, February 2, 2015

Patriots and Seahawks

Super Bowl 49 (Roman numerals aside) is in the books, and I am, of course, happy that the Patriots won.  I have watched every Super Bowl, and this was one of the best, with two, excellent teams slugging it out from the opening kickoff through the final seconds (and I'm not referring to the unfortunate fight that broke out near the end).  It's interesting that each of the Patriots' six Super Bowls in the Belichick/Brady era was decided by four points or fewer, but in this case, it speaks to the quality of play and each team's relentless determination.

The first half ended in a tie, and the second half was a seesaw, with the Seahawks seizing the initial momentum in the third quarter before yielding it to the Patriots in the fourth.  Seattle fans are surely upset this morning at the one-yard interception by Malcolm Butler that ended the game.  Had it ended differently, Patriots fans would have lamented the ball literally falling into Jerome Kearse's lap at the 5 yard line, just as we have forever lamented the David Tyree, helmet catch in the loss to the Giants after the perfect season.

All I can say to those in Seattle is that the Patriots rebounded from that loss, and there is little doubt that the Seahawks will rebound, likely into another Super Bowl in the next year or two...they are that good a team.  Tom Brady is 37 years old and nearing the end of his Hall of Fame career, whereas Russell Wilson is only 26 and just beginning his.  Wilson already has led his team to as many Super Bowl wins as Peyton Manning and Bret Favre, and he will doubtless learn from yesterday.

On the other side of that game-sealing, 1-yard interception is Malcolm Butler, a rookie whom the Patriots have raved about all year.  He did as he was taught and watched the formation and the eyes of the opposing quarterback, and came up with the improbable grab.

But what some are overlooking is the fact that Tom Brady took over the game in the fourth quarter, leading the team to two touchdowns.  Those two drives included only one running play for 3 yards.  People are saying the interception at the end was "lucky," but was it any more lucky than the 33-yard circus catch by Kearse after Butler had seemingly disrupted that pass?

In the end, great teams make their own luck, and they don't blame their misfortune on bad luck, just as three different members of the Seahawks organization (Wilson, Head Coach Pete Carroll, and Offensive Coordinator Darrell Bevell) took responsibility for the fateful interception.  It's that level of class and commitment, combined with extraordinary intelligence, talent, and determination, that will make the Seahawks winners for years to come, in much the same way the Patriots have had so much success over the last 15 years.

I'm already looking forward to next season.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Hategate

When it was first reported, more than a week ago, that my beloved Patriots could have been guilty of purposely using underinflated footballs in their win over the Colts in the AFC Championship game, I was dismayed.  I asked myself questions like, "How could they have been so stupid?" and "If this is true, can I still support them?"

Then, I started to follow the news coverage of what was quickly labeled "Deflategate" by people too young to remember Watergate, from which the suffix "gate" was determined to mean "scandal."  These people have no idea of the pattern of long-term, illegal activity in which the Nixon administration engaged, but that's a topic for another day.

Through watching and reading multiple sources, I learned that in cold, wet conditions, a football with reduced air pressure is easier to grip and throw (which I already had understood) and that the only people who are really affected by this are quarterbacks.  I also learned that any perceived issue related to underinflated footballs had been cleared up by halftime of that game.  Armed with this information, I have reviewed the box score, which shows that:
  • In the first half, the Patriots offense struggled somewhat, putting up 17 points (helped by a Colts fumble), with Brady only throwing one touchdown pass (for 1 yard).
  • In the second half, Brady was on fire, and the team scored 28 points.
One can only surmise that the first half footballs didn't help the Patriots (a fact which seems to be glossed over by most of the journalists covering this story).  So, let's examine the other aspects of this story.

Last Saturday, Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichick held a press conference in which he explained that the team had run some tests and determined the following:
  1. The balls were rubbed for some time (yes, I know how that sounds) to scuff them up and provide a better grip.  This could also increase the psi (pounds per square inch) slightly.  The temperature in the locker room is generally between 72 and 75 degrees.
  2. They were then measured to be at 12.5 psi.  The NFL allows them to be anywhere between 12.5 and 13.5 psi at game time.
  3. The balls were given to the officials, who were supposed to validate the psi (at room temperature) before turning them over to the team's Equipment Manager.  (NOTE: The NFL Rulebook states, "The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.")
  4. They were then brought outside, where the temperature at game time was 51 degrees and the barometric pressure was very low due to a storm.  It should be noted that the game started in the evening, so the temperature continued to drop throughout the game.
Belichick pointed out that when the team replicated these conditions during the week, the pressure in the balls had dropped by between 1 and 2 psi.  He challenged the reporters to duplicate this experiment.  Of course, it's more fun to report about "cheating" than trying to prove it didn't happen, so most news outlets have not accepted Bill's challenge.  However, those that have tried the experiment have, for the most part, verified the Patriots' findings, including a Pittsburgh-based organization called Headsmart.  You can read about their findings at http://fansided.com/2015/01/25/headsmart-labs-backs-bill-belichick-video/, but in summary, they found that "testing footballs to ensure they are at 12½ PSI in a 75-degree room—akin to a locker room at a stadium—and then taking those footballs into 50-degree, rainy weather could have the effect of lowering the air pressure by up to 1.9 pounds per square inch."

Now, you might ask, "Why didn't the conditions affect the Colts' footballs in the same way?"  I don't know the answer to that--the NFL has not released any information about that.  But it may be that the Colts began by inflating their balls to 13.5 psi (which some quarterbacks prefer) or that they don't rub their balls so vigorously, or maybe they prepare their balls in cooler conditions.  We won't know the answer to that until the NFL issues its findings (or we may never know the answer).  What we do know is that this morning, NFL head of officiating Dean Blandino confirmed that the NFL officials did not log the exact PSI of each football, so you might say that the officials dropped the ball (so to speak), and it's unlikely that we'll ever know their exact psi at game time.

Without any real proof, it appears that all of the accusations are being made regarding the Patriots because, as most people say, they cheated before.  So, let me take a minute to review their previous controversy, usually referred to as "Spygate."  I did my own research and asked several casual NFL observers to explain what happened during Spygate.  Most people whom I asked said that Spygate involved the Patriots illegally videotaping some activity of their opponents.  Some, with slightly more knowledge, said the Patriots illegally recorded the opposing teams' coaches sending in signals to the players.  They are wrong.  According to NFL rules, it's not illegal to record the opposing team's coaches during the game, and almost every team does it.  After all, in this age of smartphone cameras and mega-storage cards, how could they legitimately prevent that? 

Here's what happened in 2007 that resulted in the Patriots' fines and loss of a draft pick.  The NFL rules say that you can't record another team's coaches from a camera located along the sidelines.  Earlier that year, the NFL had sent out an email restating this rule.  Belichick ignored that email and kept his camera on the sideline.  Yes, it was breaking a rule, but it was done in plain view of everyone in the stadium. 

The seriousness of this offense is akin to driving through a red light just after it has changed from yellow.  If you're caught, you will pay a fine, but most people have done it (I confess), and some do it regularly.  Is one such infraction enough to be permanently labeled a criminal?  I think not.  Yet, people continue to mention Spygate when referring to Deflategate as a pattern of the Patriots cheating, although there is so far no evidence to support this latest accusation.

Even past quarterbacks like Troy Aikman and Joe Montana (Tom Brady's boyhood idol), have accused the Patriots, specifically Brady, of cheating.  Montana said, "There's only one guy that does it.  Nobody else cares what the ball feels like."  It's clear why Joe hasn't been asked to serve on any Washington think tanks.  Let's assume for a moment that the balls were intentionally deflated.  Who besides Brady might care about that?

I guess Joe didn't consider that it is estimated that more money is gambled on football games (college and professional) than all other sports combined.  Of course, there's no way to verify this because most gambling is illegal, but the American Gaming Association (yes, there is such a thing) estimated that "Americans were expected to make $3.8 billion worth of illegal bets on the 2015 Super Bowl."  Might one of those gamblers have enough motivation to have the footballs altered?  Could this gambler be willing to pay a million dollars to a ballboy or an NFL official?  Of course, this is all speculation, but it refutes Montana's preposterous innuendo that Brady is the only one who cares, and that he is sitting in a corner somewhere during the game letting air out of footballs.  It's more likely that Aikman and Montana (who played long before anyone paid much attention to psi) are sitting around watching their records fall to Tom Brady, so they have chosen to besmirch his reputation.  After all, if someone does something better than I do, they must be cheating.  Right?

This brings me to the sad point about human nature that people love to hate.  We hate anyone who is smarter, better looking, and/or more successful than we are.  Let's face it, Brady is better looking and more successful than just about anyone, and the Patriots are smarter than most other teams, as is evidenced by:
  • Owner Robert Kraft has hired two coaches since he bought the team--Pete Carroll and Bill Belichick--the coaches of the two, Super Bowl teams.
  • The Patriots lost the AFC Championship to Denver in 2014, primarily because of a weak secondary, so they obtained two of the NFL's top cornerbacks--Revis and Browner.
  • When they started the season by trading away offensive lineman Logan Mankins, they were roundly criticized, yet Brady was sacked only 21 times this year, compared to 40 last year.  In addition, the team is going to the Super Bowl this week and will have a lot of money available  next year to obtain or retain players. 
  • They are the most successful team in the NFL over the last 15 years.
Those who have known me a long time will attest that I grew up as a Dallas Cowboys fan...not because of the "America's team" crap, but because I liked how Tex Schramm and Tom Landry ran the team.  They evaluated their players based on intelligence and ability, and Landry used innovative formations like the shotgun offense and the flex defense long before they were staples of most NFL teams.  Yet, the Cowboys were hated by more fans in other cities than any other team of their era, and they were repeatedly accused of cheating.  In short, they were hated for being successful.

In the end, if it is proven that the Patriots organization somehow willfully manipulated the psi of its footballs, I will be the first one to advocate for stiff penalties and suspensions, but I'm fairly confident that won't happen.  However, I'm also confident that as long as they keep winning, the press and most of the American public will continue to hate them.  Maybe that's the real scandal; you can call it Hategate.

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

The Best Movies of 2014

Here’s the headline regarding movies in 2014—most of the big-budget, Hollywood films were either just OK or really bad.  However, the good news embedded in that headline is that there was a revival of smaller, independent films, some of which were outstanding and many of which are already available via pay-per-view and/or streaming video providers.

Before I get started listing the movies I liked, I should point out that I did not see “Two Days, One Night” and “Wild Tales,”  which might still make the list, once I get to see them.  If you know me and/or have read my list before, you probably know a few things about my movie preferences:
·  My favorite movies have both a good plot and well-developed characters.
·  I don’t like movies about nasty people doing awful things to each other.
·  I enjoy movies that either entertain me and/or in some way uplift me.
·  I don’t watch a lot of animated films.
·  I don’t include documentaries on my list.
·  I tend to like films where the script is fresh and interesting.
·  I’m not invited to free movie screenings, nor do I get to meet the casts or directors.

So, with that, here is my list of the Best Movies of 2014, in inverse order:

33.    “The Fault in Our Stars”

Directed by Josh Boone, this is a story about teenagers with cancer.  I know what you’re thinking—I said I like movies that entertain or uplift me—but this movie actually is uplifting in many ways, without being schmaltzy.  That’s due to an outstanding book by John Green, a great screenplay by Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber, and outstanding performances by Shailene Woodley (who is great in everything), Ansel Elgort, Nat Wolff, Laura Dern (who should get a special award for playing a mom in both this and “Wild”), and Willem Dafoe.  The movie is surprising in its lack of cancer-genre clichés.

32.    “The Babadook”

This low-budget Australian horror film is suspenseful less because of its villain (the title character, who first appears in a children’s book) than because of its heroine (played by Essie Davis), who is the scariest character in the movie.  As a result, you’re not sure whether what you are seeing is real or imagined.  I would have rated it higher if the director (Jennifer Kent)  hadn’t telegraphed much of the story early in the film.  But it was still riveting to watch, and the ending is equally confounding.

31.    “Obvious Child”

The brainchild (pun intended) of writer-director Gillian Robespierre, this movie stars Jenny Slate as a raunchy, Jewish comedian who has a relationship with a WASPy Midwesterner (played by Jake Lacy) that leads to her getting pregnant.  She then has to determine what to do about both the relationship and the pregnancy, and the film is neither preachy or cliché in exploring those choices.  With fine supporting performances by Gaby Hoffmann and Polly Draper, this movie defies convention.

30.    “The Theory of Everything

This is one of those movies where the acting is the reason to watch it.  While there are some good lines in the script, the direction by James Marsh is uneven and repetitive, and the focus is on Stephen Hawking and the relationship with his wife, Jane Wild, but it barely addresses the period of Hawking's life after Jane, during which he has done much of his most memorable work.  Nevertheless, the acting by Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones is superb, and well worth the price of admission.

29.    “Only Lovers Left Alive”

Writer-director Jim Jarmusch makes movies that are not for everyone (half the time, they’re not for me).  Add in his selection of Tilda Swinton and Tom Hiddleston—two actors who require little or no makeup to look like vampires, and you have the most intelligent vampire movie in a long time.  After all, it includes musical references ranging from Schubert to Eddie Cochran to Jack White, and literary references that include phony passports in the names of Daisy Buchanan and Stephen Dedalus.  The film even includes John Hurt playing Christopher Marlowe as a centuries-old vampire (I guess he’s not buried in that unmarked grave after all).  The plot centers around a married vampire couple whose immortal lives are getting stale until the entrance of her sister (played by Mia Wasikowska) who shakes things up a bit.  This movie is stylish to a fault, but it works.

28.    “The Immigrant”

It’s not a stretch to say that Marion Cotillard is one of the world’s best screen actresses, and this film supports that assertion, as she plays a Polish woman named Ewa who arrives at Ellis Island in 1921 to watch her sister taken and quarantined with tuberculosis.  Ewa spends the rest of the movie doing everything she can to survive and reunite with her sister.  In that process, she enters into a very questionable and unconventional relationship with a Jewish showman/pimp named Bruno, played by Joaquin Phoenix.  Directed by James Gray and written by Gray and Ric Menello, this film also features a scene-stealing performance by Jeremy Renner.  Overall, it paints a painfully realistic picture of life and respect in a time and place where both are undervalued.

27.    “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1”

In the third installment of this excellent series, Jennifer Lawrence reprises her role as Katniss Everdeen, who has been become the symbolic leader of the revolution.  The cast is the American equivalent of the Harry Potter movies, with recurring parts played by Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Donald Sutherland, Elizabeth Banks, Stanley Tucci, Jeffrey Wright, and the late, great Philip Seymour Hoffman.  Add in Julianne Moore, Patina Miller, and Natalie Dormer (just to name a few), and you can understand why this film, directed by Francis Lawrence, is so intriguing.  The screenplay by Peter Craig and Danny Strong, from the book by Suzanne Collins, provides ample opportunity for courage and resilience while exploring the power of love.


26.    “We Are the Best”

A Swedish film written and directed by Lukas Moodysson and starring Mira Barkhammar, Mira Grosin, and Liv LeMoyne as three 13-year-old girls who don’t fit in and, after being humiliated in gym class, decide to form a punk rock band.  Of course, only one of the girls actually knows how to play an instrument, so this isn’t one of those movies where they go on to achieve greatness or win a big competition.  Instead, the film just explores the uncomfortable and exuberant nature of being a young teenage girl, and all the insecurities that come with it.  Each parent is very different but very real—not the cartoon characters so often depicted in teen movies.  What I liked about this movie is seeing the world through the eyes of these very smart but somewhat confused young minds and the joy they take from each experience.

25.    “Beyond the Lights”

It's been a breakout year for British actress Gugu Mbatha-Raw, who starred in both "Belle" and this movie, about a young singer trying to handle the trappings of fame while dealing with her mother (played excellently by Minnie Driver) and love interest (played by Nate Parker).  The movie starts out somewhat formulaic, but eventually finds itself through the excellent direction of Gina Prince-Blythewood.  While not perfect, it is definitely worth watching and firmly establishes that Mbatha-Raw has the chops to be a fixture in the film world for years to come.

24.    “The Grand Budapest Hotel”

Intellectually, I loved this movie’s humor, absurdity, and performances by a star-studded cast that includes Ralph Fiennes, F. Murray Abraham, Adrien Brody, Willem Dafoe, and Bill Murray, just to name a few.  However, viscerally, I was left slightly underwhelmed by the inherent glibness that director Wes Anderson displayed in the movie (as he often does).  That direction and the script by Stefan Zweig lacked the sweetness and character development of Anderson’s last film, “Moonrise Kingdom,” so I ranked this lower than did most movie critics.  Even with those caveats, it is still a very good film that displays Anderson’s unusual take on the world.

23.    “Selma”
 
Written by Paul Webb and directed by Ava DuVernay, this is a powerful film that centers around the Civil Rights struggle, specifically the events that occurred in Selma, Alabama in 1964 and 1965.  There are excellent performances by David Oleyowo (as Dr. Martin Luther King), Carmen Ejogo (as Corretta Scott King), Oprah Winfrey, Tom Wilkinson (as Lyndon Johnson), and Tim Roth (as George Wallace), and there are some breathtaking moments of both cruelty and inspiration.  What hurt this movie was that first-time director DuVernay tried to include too much of the overall story while neglecting to focus on some of the really interesting characters directly involved in the Selma events.  Nevertheless, it's a story that deserves to be told and a movie that should be watched.
 
 
22.    “Locke”

Talk about a unique movie, this one features one man, in a car, talking to several characters (we only hear their voices) on a mobile phone (with Bluetooth, of course), shown in real time (everything takes place in the 90-minute length of the movie).   It doesn’t hurt that the man—Ivan Locke—is played by Tom Hardy (who had quite the year as an actor), or that the movie is excellently written and directed by Steven Knight.  It also matters that some of the voices are supplied by such fine British actors as Ruth Wilson, Olivia Colman, Andrew Scott, and Ben Daniels.  But the beauty of this movie is its immediacy—a life in turmoil is happening as you are watching it, and you feel for the lead character as much as the faceless characters on the multiple calls.  By the end, I was almost as exhausted as Ivan Locke assuredly was.

21.    “Under the Skin”

The award for “Absolutely Weirdest Movie of the Year” goes to this film, directed by Jonathan Glazer and written by Glazer and Walter Campbell from a book by Michael Faber.  Set in Scotland, it’s about a woman, played by Scarlett Johansson,  finding odd men and seducing them.  Right from the beginning, the filmmaking is very strange, but the really weird part comes as we find out who (and what) this woman really is.  I’m not sure why I was so riveted to (and by) this movie; maybe it was the eerie nature of every encounter, or maybe it was watching Johansson explore her completely naked body in a mirror for several minutes (it is Scarlett Johansson after all).  Whatever, it’s a film that plays in your head for several days after it’s over.

20.    “The Good Lie”

Another actor who had a really good year was Reese Witherspoon, who in this movie plays an employment agency counselor who has to find jobs for three men from Sudan, played by Arnold Oceng, Ger Duany, and Emmanuel Jal, who were among the “Lost Boys of Sudan.”  If you don’t know about this horrific story, I urge you to google it, so you get a better idea of what happened in Sudan from 1983 to 2005.  Adding to this film’s credibility is that actors Duany and Jal were actually among those Lost Boys.  Director Philippe Falardeau and writer Margaret Nagle exercise the good sense to make this movie about the Africans, rather than focusing much on the white people (played by Witherspoon, Cory Stoll, and Sarah Baker) who helped them settle in Kansas City.  In fact, the first part of the movie focuses on the boys and their sister, as they try to survive in Africa.  This is a good movie about a story that should be told.

19.    “The Lunchbox”

First released in 2013 but not available in the US until early in 2014, the premise of this movie revolves around a lunch delivery system in Mumbai in which someone at home prepares a lunch and puts it into a series of metal tins that become a larger “lunchbox.”  Those lunchboxes are then given to delivery men who transport them via bicycle to the office workers for whom they are intended.  The system is famously efficient, except in this rare case, when the wrong man starts receiving lunch from a woman he doesn’t know.  Soon, they start including notes and letters with those lunches, and the movie goes from there.  Written and directed by Ritesh Batra, and starring Irrfan Khan (recognizable from many other roles), Nimrat Kaur, and Nawazuddin Siddiqui (as Khan’s younger protégé), this is an excellently tender movie that reaffirms the beauty of emotions expressed in writing.

18.    “Dear White People”

Written and directed by newcomer Justin Simien, this film was incorrectly marketed as a comedy.  While there are some funny lines, it is squarely a movie about racism in many of its forms.  It starts out with characters that seem one-dimensional, but as it moves along, you start to see the other sides of many of those characters—some for the better and others for the worse, but mostly just interesting.  Tessa Thompson is outstanding in the lead role, and she is supported by good performances from an ensemble including Tyler James Williams, Teyonah Parris, Brandon Bell, and Justin Dobies.  While the film suffers from low-budget editing and a few missteps from a first-time director, it is nevertheless successful in pointing out that although there’s color in the White House, racism still exists throughout society, even in the world of academia.

17.    “The Drop”

James Gandolfini’s last role is a beauty, befitting his immense talent for expressing multiple emotions simultaneously.  He is joined here by Tom Hardy and Noomi Rapace in a movie that stayed under the radar this year but is really good.  Directed by Michaël R. Roskam from a story and script by Dennis Lehane, it explores Brooklyn’s seedy underworld, including the influence of Chechen mobsters.  But it’s more about three people whose lives have suffered through various twists and turns until they arrive at this moment, which culminates at the film’s climax on Super Bowl Sunday.  It’s just what happens when really good actors inhabit well-written characters.

16.    “Birdman”

Alejandro González Iñárritu’s unusual comedy is about the insecurities that actors face on a regular basis, and it is illuminated by outstanding performances by Michael Keaton, Naomi Watts, Edward Norton, Andrea Riseborough, Emma Stone, and Zach Galifianakis (surprisingly playing the least outrageous character in the film).  It is something of a meta-movie in that Michael Keaton (who played “Batman” earlier in his career) is playing a character who starred as “Birdman” in several movies earlier in his career.  There are scenes in this film that are absolutely brilliant at depicting the difficult and unpredictable lives of stage actors, but those scenes are often followed by ponderousness that failed to keep my interest.  As such, I ranked it lower than some other reviewers.  Nevertheless, this is still a very good film, loaded with wonderful performances.

15.    “Ida”

This is the film that surprised me the most in 2014.  Released in Europe in 2013 and in the US this year, it is set in post-WWII, socialist Poland (with English subtitles), and it’s about a beautiful young woman named Anna (played by Agata Trzebuchowska) who grew up in a convent and is about to take her vows as a nun.  However, before that occurs, the mother superior tells her she has an aunt who would like to meet her and suggests that Anna spend some time with this aunt immediately.  Upon meeting the aunt (played by Polish film icon Agata Kulesza), Anna learns that her family was Jewish, and the two women set out on a journey to learn what happened to that family.  Shot in black and white by director Pawel Pawlikowski and written by Pawlikowski and Rebecca Lenkiewicz, this is a stunningly engrossing film about loss and self-discovery, and it deserves to be seen.

14.    “Chef”

OK, I’ll be honest…I enjoy an occasional feel-good movie, and there are two on my list, including this one.  Written, directed by, and starring Jon Favreau as a well-known chef who embarrasses himself in a public spat with a restaurant critic (played by Oliver Platt), he sets out to redeem himself through the unlikely venue of a food truck.  He brings his son (played excellently by Emjay Anthony) along on the trip, which also serves as a bonding experience for them.  Favreau assembled a bunch of his friends to costar in this movie, including John Leguizamo, Bobby Cannavale, Scarlett Johansson, Robert Downey, Jr., and Dustin Hoffman.  The result is an enjoyable experience that leaves you smiling (and hungry).

13.    “Edge of Tomorrow”

One of the few big-budget films on my list, this one is like a futuristic “Groundhog Day” meets “Saving Private Ryan.”  Directed by Christopher McQuarrie and written by Jez Butterworth and John Henry Butterworth from a book by Hiroshi Sakurazaka, it stars Tom Cruise as a reluctant soldier, fighting an alien enemy, who gets splattered by an alien’s remains before he is killed.  After that, he keeps dying and waking up in the same military camp, before having to fight the same battle.  Eventually, he enlists the help of a seasoned warrior, played by Emily Blunt, and they go about trying to win the war, even though each time he dies, he has to find Blunt again and restart the process.  This is an intelligent, sci-fi, war movie that is not bogged down by typical romantic entanglements, and it’s Cruise’s best movie in years.

12.    “Nightcrawler”

Jake Gyllenhaal is at his best when there’s a creepiness beneath that movie star exterior, and here he’s at his creepy best as a disturbed young man who becomes a freelance news videographer.  Written and directed by Dan Gilroy and costarring Rene Russo and Bill Paxton, this film explores the depths of what those who produce a TV news broadcast might be willing to do for improved ratings.  Enabled by their thirst for gory news footage, the lead character starts to become a player in his own stories.  This all leads to a disturbing albeit believable conclusion.

11.    “Nymphomaniac, Volumes 1 and 2”

This X-rated examination of sexual excitement and depravity is not for the kids.  Written and directed in two volumes (each full-length features) by Lars Von Trier, it begins with Stellan Skarsgård’s character finding Charlotte Gainsbourg’s character (oddly named Joe) bruised and beaten on the street.  He takes her back to his home, where she describes her life as a nymphomaniac and he likens her activities to fly fishing (I didn’t say this is a normal set of films).  Her endeavors are shown in flashbacks first featuring Stacy Martin as young Joe and later by Gainsbourg.  They are shown in graphic detail and include segments with characters played by Shia LeBeouf, Hugo Speer, and Willem Dafoe.  Also in supporting roles are Christian Slater as Joe’s father and Uma Thurman, in a movie-stealing performance as the wife of one of Joe’s lovers.  The second volume is more disturbing than the first and includes Joe’s exploration of sadomasochism with a character played by Jamie Bell.  This is essentially a porn film, but I’m recommending it for its interesting story, well-developed characters, and well-written dialogue.

10.      “Begin Again”

As I’m sure you know, I like music, and so does this movie.  Written and directed by John Carney, it stars Keira Knightly and Mark Ruffalo (who both had good years), and it’s about a young singer-songwriter who meets a down-on-his-luck recording company executive and, after discovering some common bonds, they set out to record an album that incorporates the ambient sounds of New York City.  What I love about this film is that the relationship is not about romance; it’s about creative expression and rebirth, and the movie features fine supporting performances by Adam Levine, James Corden, Hailee Steinfeld, Catherine Keener, and Mos Def.

9.      “Whiplash”

It’s a coincidence that my Number 9 and Number 8 movies are both about music, because they couldn’t be more different.  In this film, Miles Teller plays a drumming student named Andrew, at a music conservatory, who starts playing in the school’s prestigious jazz band, led by an instructor named Fletcher, played by J.K. Simmons.  While it first seems like Fletcher is trying to coach the best out of his students, his techniques begin to appear more and more abusive.  Written and directed by Damien Chazelle, the beauty of this film lies in the performances, especially that of Simmons, who has always been a good actor but never such an Oscar-worthy one (even though the Golden Globes considered him a "supporting actor").   This is one of those roles like Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter, Marlon Brando as Vito Corleone, or Dustin Hoffman as Raymond Babbitt.  I know I’ll never forget it.

8.      “Snowpiercer”

And now for something completely different, imagine a failed climate change experiment which leaves the Earth as a frozen wasteland, incapable of supporting life.  Then, imagine that as this was happening, a few hundred people boarded a train that now travels around the globe, and that these are the only people left on Earth, but they have established a class system in which the lowest class inhabits the rear sections of the train.  This is the story behind director Joon-ho Bong’s surprisingly affective movie, starring Chris Evans, Ed Harris, John Hurt, Jamie Bell, and Tilda Swinton (who always inhabits her roles with aplomb).  I can’t say much more about it without giving away the story, but it is a very good action movie with intelligence and heart.

7.      “Pride”

This is the best feel-good movie of 2014.  It tells the true story of how, in 1984, the coal miners were on strike, and Margaret Thatcher’s government sent British police to help break it up and demoralize the miners.  A group of gay and lesbian advocates, who also felt repressed by British police, decided to start raising money to support the miners, and the result was an unlikely, and at first uncomfortable partnership between the two disparate groups.  That partnership eventually developed into friendship between a small group calling themselves “Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners” (LGSM) and most of the residents of a small, Welsh mining town.  Directed by Matthew Warchus from a script by Stephen Beresford, the film features an outstanding cast that includes Ben Schnetzer, Dominic West, Andrew Scott, Paddy Considine, Imelda Staunton, Bill Nighy, and George MacKay.  If Frank Capra were alive today, he would have liked this film, which features characters in turmoil who lift each other, and themselves, to success.


6.      “St. Vincent”

Written and directed by Theodore Melfi, this film stars Bill Murray as a drunken gambler who, through a series of circumstances, finds himself babysitting for the boy (played by Jaeden Lieberher) who lives next door.  The relationship grows as you learn the stories of both characters, as well as that of the boy's mother, played expertly by Melissa McCarthy in her most nuanced role.  Add in a pregnant Russian prostitute (played by Naomi Watts), a reasonably nice loan shark (played by Terrence Howard), and a Catholic school teacher, played by Chris O'Dowd, and you have a great cast of characters who are interesting, believable, and very entertaining in a tale of loss and redemption.


5.      “Belle”

A British film from 2013 that was not released widely in the US until early in 2014, this is written by Misan Sagay, directed by Amma Assante, and stars Gugu Mbatha-Raw—one of the few films I know of that was written, directed, and starring three different women of color.  In it, the character of Dido Elizabeth Belle (played as a young girl by Lauren-Julien Box) is the mixed-race daughter of a Royal Navy Captain (played by Matthew Goode).  When her mother dies, she goes to live with his aristocratic parents, played by Tom Wilkinson and Emily Watson.  While her lineage provides her with certain benefits, her skin color restricts her socially, and that dichotomy is explored throughout the movie.  All this is also occurring while there is a movement afoot to end slavery in England, and the eventual decision may have to be made by Wilkinson’s character, who is the Lord Chief Justice.  Rather than being a stuffy, British, period piece, this is an exciting and rewarding film.

4.      “Wild”

Cheryl Strayed’s memoir of a broken woman who finds redemption by hiking 1100 miles is brought to life beautifully by screenwriter Nick Hornby, director Jean-Marc Vallée, and star Reese Witherspoon.  This could have been a really boring movie, but instead it captures your interest in the opening scene and holds it until the quietly triumphant conclusion.  Aided by outstanding performances by Laura Dern and Thomas Sadoski, the viewer feels everything that Cheryl felt after the loss of her mother and her subsequent descent into addiction and promiscuity, and how her reawakening came along the Pacific Coast Trail.  Witherspoon’s Oscar-worthy performance is her best to date, and she was completely believable in the role, even in carrying the same, 70-pound backpack that Strayed had carried.  The cinematography by Yves Bélanger is often breathtaking, and this is a film worth seeing.

3.      “Boyhood”

This brings new meaning to the concept of commitment to a film project.  Every year, for twelve years, writer-director Richard Linklater assembled the same cast for two weeks to film scenes for this movie.  The result is the ability to watch the same actor (Ellar Coltrane) playing the same character (Mason), starting at the age of 6 and concluding when he is 18.  Playing his parents over the same period are Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette, and both are brilliant in those roles.  The director had his own daughter, Lorelei Linklater, play Mason’s sister, Samantha.  In the hands of a lesser director, this movie could have been gimmicky, but Linklater also has experience developing long-term characters in the “Before” movies (“Before Sunrise,” “Before Sunset,” and “Before Midnight”), and he (and Ethan Hawke) drew on that experience to make a movie in which the characters lead interesting lives, without so much happening as to seem unreal.  By the end of the 2 hours, 45 minutes it took to watch this movie, I really felt like I knew these characters, and their strengths and faults, much better than in typical movies, which simulate the passage of time.

2.      “Interstellar”

Director Christopher Nolan combined visual elements of Spielberg and Kubrick with his own sensitive script (co-written with his brother Jonathan) and modern filming techniques to explore themes first described by Einstein and Hawking while making them accessible to the common moviegoer.  That’s no small accomplishment, and this is a fine movie that examines the relationships between time and space as well as the relationships between characters played by Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, John Lithgow, Michael Caine, Casey Affleck, Matt Damon, and a slew of other, talented actors.  The film explores how our own humanity can both positively and negatively affect our environment and our endeavors to improve that environment.  The convoluted plot has to do with the Earth dying and a plan to travel through a wormhole to find a planet capable of supporting life.  But that plot is secondary to the development of the characters while the secrets of time and space are revealed.  This is a well-written movie that is visually arresting and emotionally fulfilling, and I strongly recommend it.

1.      “The Imitation Game”

When Alan Turing and his team eventually built the first electromechanical machine designed to break complex codes, what they were doing essentially was inventing the first prototype of what we now call a computer.  This movie is a fictionalized account of that invention, and how it was driven by the necessity to break the code the Nazis used with their Enigma machine to convey messages to their troops and ships.  But this movie, directed by Morten Tyldum and written by Graham Moore from a book by Andrew Hodges, does much more than that.  It examines the inner mind of a genius who was also a homosexual—something not tolerated in 1940s England.   Played brilliantly by Benedict Cumberbatch, Turing had to live in a world in which he was different from most other people in terms of his intellectualism, his views of societal norms, and his sexual preference.  The film also explores the restricted views of women in society and how Joan Clarke (an actual person played in the movie by Keira Knightly) had to deal with those views while trying to forge a role as a female mathematician.   With additional, excellent supporting performances by Matthew Goode, Rory Kinnear, Charles Dance, Alan Leech, Matthew Beard, and Tom Goodman-Hill, the film has layers of complexity and addresses difficult issues without seeming preachy.  By the end, I felt exhilarated that I had witnessed a historical milestone while despondent that 60 years later, even the most progressive nations are still slow in accepting and respecting our differences.  The film accomplishes all of that while still being entertaining and well-constructed.  As such, it is clearly the best movie of 2014.