Sunday, January 13, 2013

Best Movies of 2012

As I watched the Golden Globes this year, I realize how much I disagree with the choices of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, but their agenda is to award people they know and like, while mine is to list movies that in some way entertained me this year.  At this point, I have seen most of the Oscar contenders, and there were a few that I intentionally left off this list (including "Amour," "Django Unchained," and "Life of Pi").  Also, I also don’t include documentaries, because comparing them to scripted and acted films is like the proverbial “apples to oranges.”  
 
Maybe it’s because I’m a guy, or maybe it’s because there were so few good dramas this year, but a number of films on my list were action-oriented, or at least contained action scenes.  So, here it is—my list of the Best Movies of 2012, in inverse order.
 
21.    Prometheus
This was Ridley Scott’s prequel to “Alien,” and while it at times lacks energy and/or strains disbelief (hey, it is at the bottom of the list), it is nevertheless entertaining.  Also, the story is constructed in a way that explains many of the plot concepts of the “Alien” movies, and it features good performances by Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, and Charlize Theron.
 
20.    Battleship
This is a movie I was surprised to like—I rented it thinking it was a stupid action film based on an old board game.  Fortunately, I was wrong; it is much better than that, in part because of Peter Berg’s deft direction and decent acting by Liam Neeson, Alexander Skarsgård, and Taylor Kitsch.  Granted, it’s not the best alien invasion movie ever made, but it is definitely an entertaining 2+ hours.
 
19.    The Hunger Games
Just because something is popular with teenage girls doesn’t mean it’s not good…OK, well most of the time it means that (the “Twilight” series), but this time, there is enough real story and talent involved that the movie is actually worth watching.  That talent includes director/co-writer Gary Ross and a cast including Stanley Tucci, Wes Bentley, Woody Harrelson, and of course Jennifer Lawrence, who seems to shine in every role she accepts.
 
18.    Magic Mike
This is actually the second of two, very good movies that Steven Soderbergh released in 2012, and it tells the sometimes shady story of a male stripper, played by Channing Tatum in a somewhat autobiographical role, who is performing in an act run by a character played by Matthew McConaughey.  Unlike other movies about similar themes, the various characters in this film are multi-dimensional, rather than just being blatantly sleazy, and the lead character shows significant growth from the beginning until the film’s ending.
 
17.    Men in Black 3
If you enjoyed the previous “Men in Black” movies, you’ll really like this one, if for no other reason than the fun of seeing (and hearing) Josh Brolin as a young version of the Tommy Lee Jones character.  Of course, Jones himself is also in the movie, as are Will Smith, Emma Thompson, and a variety of entertaining, computer-generated aliens.  Barry Sonnenfeld seems to have as much fun making these movies as I do watching them.
 
16.    The Avengers
I grew up reading the Avengers comic books and reveling in the adventures of Captain America, Thor, the Hulk, Iron Man, and the other characters who comprised the Avengers.  So when I heard that Joss Whedon would direct the film, I was very excited.  And while the results were somewhat mixed, I still totally enjoyed watching my childhood superheroes come to life.  This is a good action movie with enough human interaction to make it very watchable.
 
15.    Salmon Fishing in the Yemen
Yeah, it sounds stupid, which is what makes this film so appealing, not to mention terrific acting by Ewan McGregor, Emily Blunt, and Kristin Scott Thomas.  But it’s the thoughtful and honestly heartfelt direction of Lasse Hallström, who seems to bring a high level of quality to every film he directs, that makes this film special.
 
14.    Haywire
This Steven Soderbergh film was officially released in 2011, but did not appear in theaters until late January of 2012.  It stars Gina Carano and Ewan McGregor, with supporting roles by Michael Douglas and Channing Tatum, and it is a taut, well-acted spy-action movie that keeps you interested and involved from start to finish.
 
13.    The Dark Knight Rises
While this is the weakest movie of the new Batman series, it is still very good.  Christopher Nolan’s direction is sharp and insightful, and the addition of characters played by Anne Hathaway, Marion Cotillard, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Matthew Modine to a cast that already included Christian Bale, Morgan Freeman, and Michael Caine makes this film a must-see.
 
12.    Skyfall
I’m not a huge James Bond fan, considering most of the movies to be action fluff.  But this one has a major difference from the others in that it’s directed by Sam Mendes, whose films are rarely vapid or light.  The other difference is Daniel Craig, who has brought a new depth to the Bond franchise.  And despite Javier Bardem’s hammy overacting, the supporting cast that includes Judi Dench and Ralph Fiennes is very strong.  This Bond is worth seeing.
 
11.    Zero Dark Thirty
I was somewhat disappointed by this film, which was all plot and very little character development, but director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal told a very interesting and at times riveting tale.  Jessica Chastain did a good job as the woman behind the hunt for Osama Bin Laden, but most of the other characters were seriously underdeveloped.  Despite those shortcomings, the movie is worth seeing for the way it builds as you watch the clues unfold and the plans being developed and carried out.
 
10.    The Sessions
Starting with a great script by director Ben Lewin based on the writings of Mark O'Brien (the actual person about whom the movie is based), this is a wonderfully touching film about a 38-year-old polio victim, who can only control the movements of his head and who is mostly confined to an iron lung, and his efforts to lose his virginity and find requited love.  John Hawkes and Helen Hunt are outstanding in the lead roles, as are the supporting performances by William H. Macy and Moon Bloodgood.  This could have been depressing, but instead was remarkably humorous and uplifting.

9.      Argo
Ben Affleck directs and stars in this film about a CIA operative who hatches an inventive scheme to rescue a group of Americans from revolutionary Iran.  The story is interestingly told, and my favorite aspect involves the characters played by Alan Arkin and John Goodman as the “producers” of the phony movie that forms the basis of the rescue plans.  With this film, Affleck has established himself as an A-list director, and although the ending is a bit Hollywood-ized, it is still very involving.
 
8.      Beasts of the Southern Wild
Wow, where did this come from?  It was actually the product of two Wesleyan graduates—producer Michael Gottwald (whom I actually saw perform in a play with Alex) and director/co-writer Benh Zeitlin.  This was a fascinating movie about a group of characters barely surviving in “the Bathtub”—a southern Delta community at the edge of the world.  But the revelation is the performance of 6-year-old Quvenzhané Wallis, who stars as the film’s central character, known as Hushpuppy.  This is an outstanding and beautiful film that demonstrates the triumph of the spirit over seemingly invincible odds.
 
7.      Looper
This was a very intelligent film about a futuristic society where when the mob wants someone killed, they send that person 30 years into the past where someone else is waiting to gun them down…that way, there is no body to dispose of.  The plot turns when the person being sent back is an older version of the person expected to kill him. Director/writer Rian Johnson was the mastermind behind this very complex movie, which features Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano, and an outstanding performance by Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  Some people may be turned off by the violence, but it is central to the plot (unlike “Django Unchained”), and this film’s ending is haunting and thought-provoking.
 
6.      Cabin in the Woods
This may be the smartest horror film I’ve ever seen.  Director Drew Goddard shares writing credits with Joss Whedon for a script full of dark humor an unforeseen plot twists.  I can’t say any more without giving away those twists.  All I will say is that what you’re seeing may not actually be what is occurring.  If you like horror films, you should definitely see this one.
 
5.      Moonrise Kingdom
I’ve never been a fan of Wes Anderson’s movies, usually considering them to be smarmy and unlikeable, but this one is completely different.  It’s a delightful fable about young love and the adults who are preventing it, and it’s told in a quirky style that made me smile throughout.  It also features actors including Bruce Willis, Edward Norton, Frances McDormand, Bill Murray, and Tilda Swinton.  But the real stars are the brave children, played by Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward, as well as the peculiar script by Wes Anderson and Roman Coppola.
 
4.      Cloud Atlas
If nothing else, this is the year’s most ambitious film, spanning centuries, and placing several actors in multiple roles in varying time periods, only to eventually tie together their stories.  I totally enjoyed most of those stories, while understanding that some segments worked better than others.  Based on the novel by David Mitchell and co-directed by Tom Twyker, Andy Wachowski, and Lana Wachowski (the Wachowskis also directed “The Matrix” trilogy), this movie’s cast includes Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Hugo Weaving, Hugh Grant, Susan Sarandon, Xun Zhou, and Jim Sturgess.  Overall, it worked far more often than it stumbled.
 
3.      Les Miserables
As with most movies, it all begins with the source material—in this case, the spectacular musical version of Victor Hugo’s most famous novel.  I’ve read several movie reviewers who clearly don’t like the musical itself…so they naturally dislike the movie of it.  Personally, I’ve seen the musical performed on stage four times, and I enjoyed each production…so here’s my review of the movie version.  (1) I loved the idea of singing it live while filming it, unlike most movie musicals which record the score separately in a studio.  Given that the entire musical is sung (they spoke a few lines in the movie), it would have been silly to re-record the entire soundtrack.  (2) I liked a lot of director Tom Hooper’s close-ups…I just think he used them a little too much.  (3) The cast was generally very good, with Hugh Jackman starting slow but  improving as the film went along, and Anne Hathaway, Samantha Barks, Eddie Redmayne, and Aaron Tveit submitting the best performances.  (4) The casting of Russell Crowe as Javert was a disaster, and having him sing “Stars,” which is among the best songs ever written for the stage, is equivalent to casting Roseanne Barr to play Grizabella (who sings “Memory”) in “Cats.”  Crowe’s voice has no quality or nuance, and his acting wasn’t much better.  I still enjoyed the movie, but it should have been the year’s best film, and in a stronger year, it might not have even made my top five.
 
2.      Silver Linings Playbook
A dramedy about mental illness should not be this enjoyable, but in the hands of a director as talented as David O. Russell, it is.  Jennifer Lawrence submits an Oscar-worthy performance as the female lead, playing opposite Bradley Cooper, who showed more talent in this movie than in all of his previous roles combined.  Set in Philadelphia, the movie explores the relationship between the two leads, who have each been ostracized by friends and family due to their bouts with different mental issues.  Add in excellent supporting roles by Jacki Weaver and Robert DeNiro, whose character’s own mental issues are displayed with increasing frequency, and you have a movie that is alternatively difficult and enjoyable.  Although the plot becomes slightly predictable, the strength of the characters carries this movie and makes it one of the year’s very best films.
 
1.      Lincoln
If you’re expecting a major biopic about the life and times of Abraham Lincoln, you will be disappointed.  This is not a big movie.  Rather, the outstanding script by Tony Kushner, based in part on a book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, tells the story of a short period at the beginning of Lincoln’s second term when he does everything in his power to pass the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery.  This is a beautiful and elegant film, directed by Steven Spielberg, starring Daniel Day Lewis, and featuring supporting performances by Tommy Lee Jones, Sally Field, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and a wealth of other excellent actors.  It presents a picture of a president who is tortured by his own personal situation and seemingly aware that he is running out of time to accomplish the crowning glory of his legacy.  It also shows Lincoln to be the conniving politician that he was, who used homespun humor and stories to disarm his adversaries while promoting a humanist agenda that was far ahead of its time.  Unlike other Spielberg movies, the beauty of this film lies in its small and personal nature, in a world where great strides can be accomplished with a handshake, a promise, or in some cases, a deceit.  It is a complex story of a complex man, told eloquently and succinctly, and it is the year’s best film.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Save Us, Mr. Kraft

Last year, when the NFL underwent a lockout that threatened to close down the season, Patriots owner Robert Kraft, even while dealing with his wife's terminal illness, stepped in and engineered an agreement.  So, here we have the NFL in 2012, and the referees cannot come to an agreement with the league, which has gone out and hired the worst group of replacement referees imaginable, from Division 2 and 3 college programs.

They don't know the rules, they are heavily influenced by the coaches and the crowds, and they blow about 50% of the calls--that is no exaggeration.  Either that or they make no calls, allowing the games to more resemble hockey than football, with repeated fights breaking out.

We're three weeks into the season, and I've watched too many of these games.  It is painful...I'd rather they stopped playing altogether than continue with this farce.  I'm begging you, Mr. Kraft, to work your magic again and get the NFL refs back to work.  Otherwise, I will stop watching, as will millions of other viewers who feel ripped off by a sport which the league is allowing to fall apart.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Message for a Post-9/11 World

For the past 10 years, I've included a message in our Passover seders about 9/11, and I figured that today is a good day to post a version of it on my blog, so here it is:

September 11th.  The image of large planes crashing into giant buildings leaps into our collective visual memory.

That a few lost lunatics could have such a dour impact on the world is almost unfathomable.  It sickens us, it scares us, and it makes us wonder what kind of hold a belief can have on people’s minds to cause them to have so little regard for the lives of themselves and others.

We have no answers.  We don’t even know what question to ask.  Because by asking the question, we admit that it’s possi­ble for humankind to be so wrong.  Maybe we thought it ended with the Ice Age or the Dark Ages.  Perhaps we assumed it had been killed with Hitler in the bunker.  But the dominant feature is its resiliency.  Evil waits for its moment.

That’s why it's important to remember where we came from and understand each other.  The true message of any religion is the impor­tance of spirituality in our lives.  Without it, we are little more than soulless mammals on the cool wet surface of a massive ball of molten lava.  With it, we can all be angels, basking in the glow of tolerance and peace.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Letter to the Boy Scouts

David Steakley and his family have been like our extended family for the past 26 years, since shortly after we moved to Framingham.  We have watched Dave grow up, and we attended his Eagle Scout ceremony, as well as several other events, including his wedding last year.

Recently, Dave wrote an amazing letter to the Boy Scouts of America, and he gave me permission to post it on this blog.  I hope it impresses you as much as it does me.  Feel free to share it with your friends, because it carries a message that we should not ignore.

July 24, 2012

Boy Scouts of America
1325 Walnut Hill Lane
P.O. Box 152079
Irving, TX 75015-2079

To Bob Mazzuca, Wayne Brock and the Board of Directors of the National Council of the Boy Scouts of America,

My name is David Steakley and I am writing to implore that you to reconsider your recent decision to continue to ban the participation of gay youth and adult leaders from Scouting.

I earned the rank of Eagle Scout in 2003 with Troop 78 in Framingham, Massachusetts and the Knox Trail Council. I was a member of the Order of the Arrow, worked as a counselor for numerous summers at my council’s summer camp, and was a very active scout for a number of years. Scouting still occupies a cherished space in my life and I hope someday to participate in scouting with my own children.

I am not gay, but I am deeply troubled that an organization that acts as a force for good in the lives of so many young men can actively choose to continue a punitive and discriminatory policy. My experiences as a scout were some of the most important moments in my life. These experiences helped to mold me into the confident, productive adult and citizen of the community, the nation and the world that I am today. Above all, I learned that hard work and difficult tasks in service of others is a noble goal, and that boys and men must lead by example to make their communities a better place for everyone.

For these reasons, I cannot understand BSA’s decision to deny these opportunities to boys and families solely based on their sexual orientation. The BSA promotes diversity and makes space for everyone in all other areas; why not this one? Every merit badge book inclusively pictures boys of every race. It would be laughable to exclude boys or their families based on race or religion. It is similarly absurd to exclude them based on whom they love.

The BSA prides itself on fostering the ethic of service for the good of the community. What better example could the adult men in charge of the BSA demonstrate then by making the hard choice of helping these boys and their families find acceptance in the same way as everyone else? Certain members of the community will not be comfortable with this policy change, but change and personal growth are often uncomfortable. The results, however, are worth it. The Scout Oath says, “On my honor I will do my best …to help other people at all times”. Scouting should act as a leader encouraging its participants to become better people and to grow, not allow them to hide behind an institutional policy that discriminates against its own members to escape that growth. If this policy were to change tomorrow a new generation of boys would grow up to learn that gay men and women are no different than their peers. The BSA could again be a driver of meaningful social change in America.

In taking a pragmatic approach, I pose these questions: Will the BSA find itself on the right side of history with this choice? How will you reflect on this policy in 15 or 20 years? Will you be proud that you stood in the way of social progress and made the lives of these boys and their families more difficult than they already were? It is obvious that with time the public will rightly come to accept that gay people deserve to be treated with equity. Rather than standing in the way of this change why not embrace it and be on the morally just side of history and known as an organization that can be counted on for true social leadership. The real morally straight position on this issue is to affirm the inherent worth and dignity of every person, regardless of sexual orientation.

Please do the right thing and reevaluate this policy as scouts, adults, and leaders of boys.

With hope for change,
David Steakley

Friday, June 22, 2012

No Compromise

Throughout our nation’s history, there have been rancorous divides between political parties, with one party using filibusters, parliamentary tactics, media pronouncements, and even impeachment as tools in its attempts to thwart the efforts of another.  But when it comes down to it, common sense usually prevails, and aside from the Civil War, politicians have been willing to reach some form of consensus for the good of the country.  After all, despite their political pandering, most people in public office want to do what is right…at least that’s what I have always believed.

Now, I’m not so sure, because there are movements afoot to quash any candidate or office-holder who is willing to compromise with his or her political opponents.  Recently, members of the Tea Party succeeded in convincing a fickle electorate to defeat Senator Richard Lugar, primarily because of his propensity to compromise.  They almost defeated Orrin Hatch for the same reason.  As a backlash, there is a movement brewing in Democratic circles to tell President Obama to adopt a policy of “no compromise with the Tea Party.”

If the old maxim is true that “an eye-for-eye and tooth-for-tooth would lead to a world of the blind and toothless,” then it only seems reasonable that continued pronouncements of “no compromise” will eventually lead to no communication at all.  When the famous Senator Henry Clay was referred to as the “great compromiser” in the early 1800s, the term “great” was not being used sarcastically.  In fact, many believe that without Clay, the nation would have fallen apart way before the Civil War, and may not have been able to recover.  It’s not coincidental that he died eight years before that war began.

As a more recent example, it seems clear that were it not for the efforts of Senators like Edward Kennedy and Orrin Hatch working their respective sides of the aisle, many of the successes of the past 50 years might not have occurred.  Now those senators, and others like them, are either dead, defeated, or aging, and those coming behind them seem to offer a different take on the nature of consensus.

I am currently torn as to whether or not to vote for Scott Brown, if for no other reason than he seems willing to compromise.  But if his election will provide more power to other Republicans more strident in their beliefs, he may have to be a casualty.  I’m waiting for the Massachusetts Senate debates to learn if Elizabeth Warren will be open to hearing all sides of an issue before making a decision.  While I agree with her on many issues, I will not vote for her if I believe her election will lead to greater divisiveness.

So what I am proposing is that reasonable people make this their litmus test: if a candidate is willing to compromise, even slightly, for the good of the country, and he or she demonstrates that willingness in action, that candidate should be worthy of consideration at the ballot box.  If not, we may be headed down a path from which there is little redemption.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

New Songs for a Passover Seder

I was thinking about our modern seder, and I realized that all of the songs are either original Hewbrew songs or silly ditties based on very old melodies. So, I thought I'd take a hand at crafting some Passover songs that delved a little deeper into the meaning of Passover and the characters who populate its story.

I wrote the lyrics for the seven songs below, basing them on popular songs from the 60s through last year. Feel free to use them in your seder, but keep in mind that these original melodies have been copyrighted, and so it is illegal to record them or to sell them.

Also, the songs on which they are based are fairly complex melodies with lots of changes, so everyone may not be able to sing along with them. If you use them, I recommend at least one person rehearsing with them in advance, so he or she can become familiar and lead them. My cousin Karen, the lyrics maven, thinks they are pretty good, so here they are:


Let the Seder Start(Sung to the tune of “Let the River Run”—Lyrics
by Reid Fishman)

Let the Seder start.
It’s time to gather at the table,
and tell the tale of Passover.

Family and friends,
recall a story that’s familiar,
referred to as the Exodus.

It’s all about our freedom
from oppression,
under the Egyptians.

It matters more today
than it ever did,
because of all the bad stuff
that gets hidden…

From the media,
so for tonight we’ll be at one with
people all around the world.

What we say tonight,
we say for all who are downtrodden.
May you live in freedom and peace.
May you live in freedom and peace.


That’s Why We Do the Seder Plate(Sung to the tune of “The Way
You Do the Things You Do” —Lyrics by Reid Fishman)

Let’s start off with Karpas.
Greens represent the birth of Israel.
And then there’s some Maror,
Bitterness shows that slavery was real.

And then there’s Haroset,
looks like the bricks we made when slaving.
And Matzah was the bread,
baked on our backs as we were leaving.

Oh, these are the things that we use to commemorate
our time in Egypt.
That’s why we do the Seder plate.

There’s also Zeroa,
The roasted shankbone of an animal.
It signifies sacrifice,
Within the need for our survival.

And finally there’s Baytzah,
a hard-boiled egg that has been roasted,
a symbol of rebirth,
in all the Seders that we’ve hosted.

Oh, these are the things that we use to commemorate
our time in Egypt.
That’s why we do the Seder plate.


A Passover Seder (The Four Questions)(Sung to the tune of “The End of the
World” —Lyrics by Reid Fishman)

Why is this night so different
from every other night?
Don’t you know? It’s a Passover Seder.
We’re here to celebrate it right.

Why do we eat only matzah
instead of all other bread?
Don’t you know? They grabbed all of the bread dough,
And threw it in their bags when they fled.

I’ll wake tomorrow morning and I’ll wonder
why I can’t make some waffles today.
And then I will remember, that it still is Passover,
and that’s just not the kosher way.

Why do we eat bitter herbs?
Why do we dip karpas twice?
Don’t you know, it’s a Passover Seder,
these customs will be made to suffice.

I’ll wake tomorrow morning and I’ll wonder
why I can’t have some Cheerios today.
And then I will remember, that it still is Passover,
and that’s just not the kosher way.

Why sit reclined at the table,
dropping our food on our chairs?
Don’t you know? It’s a Passover Seder.
It ends when we have finished the prayers.


I Hope That Pharaoh Doesn’t Mind(Sung to the tune of “New York State of
Mind” —Lyrics by Reid Fishman)

(The Pharaoh’s daughter sings)

Sometimes, I just take a walk,
take a quiet stroll here along the Nile.
I watch the blue water flow along,
and it makes me smile.
But today there’s a basket, and a baby I did find.
I hope that Pharaoh doesn’t mind.

Surely it is a little boy
that was set adrift by a Jewish slave.
He’s so young and so innocent,
someone that I saved.
I would sure like to keep him;
have him with me all the time.
I hope that Pharaoh doesn’t mind.

It’s been so boring living day by day,
there’s not much for me to do.
But now I have a purpose that is all my own.
I’ll raise this boy…this little Jew.

Should I go ask the Pharaoh now,
what he thinks of this new idea I’ve had?
I'm not sure I should tell him,
but he is my dad.
I’ll name the baby Moses, and with him I’ll be so kind.
I hope that Pharaoh doesn’t mind.
I hope that Pharaoh doesn’t mind.


The Leader(Sung to the tune of “The Boxer” —Lyrics by Reid Fishman)

(Moses sings)

I was raised Egyptian though I always felt it strange
that no one could say exactly where I came from other than a floating bassinet.
All lies I say, but there was no explanation to describe why
I was here,
so I wondered if I’d ever find my way.

As I grew a little older, I began to realize, that I was so
very different
from the Pharaoh and all his lowly followers.
But the Jews, they just seemed to make more sense to me in
what they say and do,
and I knew that I was one of them, it’s true.

Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la-lie.

So I realized that I’m a Jew and must defend the slaves from
the tyranny around them,
and that I’m the one to lead them to the promised land.
I went to bat, for my people to leave Egypt,
but the Pharaoh made it clear that what I believe is just not where he’s at.

Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la-lie

But God saw the
situation and he hastened to our aide.
He unleashed the plagues on Egypt, culminating in the killing of the first-born
sons.
The Pharaoh cried as he said he would release us, so we
grabbed our things and left,
and we ran away before he changed his mind.

Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la. Lie-la-lie.
Lie-la-la-la-lie

Now they see me as the leader, and I don’t know what to do.
I can tell they are not ready to go right to the promised land.
So I guess we’re doomed to wander, and I will be the guy,
I will lead them through the desert, until the day I die.
Die-da-die.
Die-da-die-die-da-da-die.

Die-da-die. Die-da-da-da.
Die-da-die.
Die-da-die.
Die-da-da-da. Die-da-die.
Die-da-da-da-die.


Freeing the Jews
(Sung to the tune of “Someone Like You” —Lyrics
by Reid Fishman)

(Pharaoh sings)

First the water became blood red,
Frogs and lice and flies, soon the cows were dead.
We got boils, hail and locusts flew.
It got so dark that we didn’t know what to do.
But far worse is my son had to die.
He was my first born, and I could only cry.

I sent a summons out to my old friend Moses
and I asked why he did it, why he chose us.
I had hoped he’d tell me that it’s just how it goes,
but what he said is let us go now.

So I find myself freeing the Jews.
I can’t believe it’s all I can do.
I’m conflicted, I know.
Should I just let them go,
or should I send my troops to kill them instead?
So, I sent the troops to kill them, I did.

The Jews got stuck at the Red Sea shore.
My troops found them there and prepared for war.
Moses raised his staff and the waters split,
and they walked right through, crossing all of it.

I sent my troops down into the Red Sea to get them.
They were going to escape, I couldn’t let them,
but the water returned, I can’t forget the way they screamed.
My troops all drowned there.

So I found myself freeing the Jews.
I can’t believe it’s all I could do.
‘Though conflicted, I know,
I should have just let them go,
but I sent the troops to kill them instead.
Now I know just why the Red Sea is red.

So I found myself freeing the Jews.
I can’t believe it’s all I could do.
‘Though conflicted, I know,
I should have just let them go,
but I sent the troops to kill them instead.
Now I know just why the Red Sea is red.


Now the Seder Ends
(Sung to the tune of “Let the River Run”
—Lyrics by Reid Fishman)

Now the Seder ends.
We’ve told a story for the ages,
on this night of Passover.

Don’t forget this tale,
and all the messages behind it,
of liberty and freedom for all.

Help others to remain strong,
under oppression,
wherever it may happen.

Remembering what
the Seder taught
may make it better for
your sons and daughters.

So as we conclude
all the components of the Seder,
Passover has meaning for all.

And we like to say,
that maybe we can be together,
next year in Jerusalem.
Next year in Jerusalem.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Republican Policies

Maybe it's genetic; after all, my grandmother was a Communist, and my parents were progressive Democrats. Or maybe it's environmental; I live in Massachusetts--a place that evokes disdain in several regions of the country. Whatever the reason, I have always espoused what many would consider a liberal (another of those disdain-laden words), Democratic philosophy, but having turned 58 earlier this year (an age by which my beliefs were supposed to have become more conservative), I find myself desperately trying to understand the philosophy of the Republican party.

I no longer think that big business is bad (as I did when I was young). That would be somewhat hypocritical, given that most of my clients throughout my career have been very large companies. I also now understand the value of the CIA and the Defense Department, although I feel that their efforts have sometimes been misguided. I now read several newspapers and magazines with moderate perspectives (as opposed to Mother Jones, to which I subscribed in my younger years), and I watch CNN as opposed to MSNBC, to get a more balanced perspective (although I still can't force myself to listen to the vitriol offered on Fox News).

Having said all that, I still have several issues with Republicans and their views of government:
  • Republicans have always believed that big business is good for America. They are the party that has favored "trickle down" economics and tax cuts for the wealthy and the large corporations. It was, after all, George W. Bush who initiated the bank bailout of 2008-09, without which most economists agreed that the world would have plunged into a second Great Depression. That may have been the last thing anyone has done that had substantial, bipartisan support, so why do the Republicans seem to vilify Obama for that bailout, and the subsequent stimulus packages that poured billions more into the economy? On the day that Obama was inaugurated, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell below 8,000; last week, it exceeded 13,000. Can anyone tell me how that is bad for big business or the economy?

  • Along those same lines, the presumptive Republican nominee, Mitt Romney, has decried the government bailout of the US auto industry, which was initiated by Bush and continued by Obama. However, that industry has rebounded faster and stronger than anyone anticipated, and the "big three" have already paid back most of what was lent them. So, how is this bad for America?

  • Switching to social issues, the latest attack has come because Obama favors full contraception insurance coverage for female employees at religiously affiliated institutions. Republicans claim that this policy abridges the first amendment, which begins, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." To me, the connection between these two concepts is highly questionable, but forgetting that, let's consider the following realities: most Catholic hospitals exist in inner-city settings or near Hispanic communities, where the employees are likely to be less affluent than their counterparts at the larger, secular, teaching hospitals. If they can't afford contraception and abortion is taboo (another misguided Republican principle), then the only option is to have more unwanted babies born into families with limited means to support and care for them. How, exactly, is this good for America? Obama placated the Republicans by backing off on this issue, but they still rally around it.

  • Along those same lines, I don't understand why the Republicans are so opposed to the health care plan they deride as "Obamacare." Prior to 2008, a huge majority of Americans clamored for health care that would prohibit insurers from: (A) imposing lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits, (B) excluding pre-existing medical conditions, (C) charging co-payments or deductibles for preventive care, and (D) establishing annual spending caps. The new health plan prohibits all of those actions while insuring 32 million previously uninsured Americans. In addition, it is administered by insurance companies and not the government, a provision upon which Republicans insisted. A very similar, even stronger plan already exists in Massachusetts (as introduced by Romney), and it works; costs have not risen significantly and health care has improved. So why do the Republicans, including Romney, vow to repeal the national health plan?

  • I still don't understand how a party can claim that life is too sacred to allow abortions, while favoring the death penalty and opposing restrictions on handguns and assault rifles. The gun lobby consistently cites the second amendment, which reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." They cling to the second part of that amendment while completely neglecting the phrase, "well regulated," instead claiming that any effort to regulate gun ownership is unconstitutional. Let's put aside the constitution for a minute and focus on common sense...a line must be drawn somewhere, or we would allow normal citizens to own bazookas, grenade launchers, military vehicles, fighter jets, or nuclear weapons. Clearly, we don't allow that, so why can't we limit handguns and assault rifles? I don't know anyone who uses them on hunting expeditions. However, despite Republican protestations that Democrats are out to take away their guns, Obama has been silent on this issue.

  • Let me move on to the issues related to "family values"...specifically gay marriage and a woman's reproductive rights. With regard to gay marriage, it wasn't so long ago that many states banned interracial marriage, but now the president is a product of such a marriage. It all falls under the "if-you're-not-like-me-then-you-must-be-wrong" approach that many Americans seem to favor. It's silly to tell someone whom they can't love, and Republicans should stop grandstanding to people's basest instincts and take the high road. With regard to women's reproductive rights, it amazes me that the same party that derides government regulation, so strongly favors regulating what a woman does with her body. The fact is that Republicans preach family values while allowing a snake like Newt Gingrich to run for president...a well-documented philanderer who divorced his wife when it was revealed she had cancer so he could marry the woman with whom he'd been cheating. I will say that Romney and Santorum both appear to be dedicated husbands and fathers, but no more so than Obama and several gay couples I know.

  • So that leaves foreign policy. Obama promised that in his first term, he would end the war in Iraq and take steps to do the same in Afghanistan. He has followed through on those promises while ensuring continuity by initially retaining Bush's defense secretary and joint chiefs of staff. In the meantime, he ordered the killing of Bin Laden and many of Al Quaeda's top operatives. The main difference between Obama and Republican contenders is his realization that the era of American economic dominance is coming to an end and that we are already heavily indebted to China, which has four times our population. Consequently, he has shifted our global approach away from the jingoistic bluster of the 20th century to a softer stance of partnership and collaboration.

In addition, it's interesting to note that while the Republican party claims to be better suited to address the economy, history doesn't support that claim. Indeed, every major recession or depression of the 20th century occurred during a Republican administration while every recovery was overseen by a Democrat. Furthermore, while Republicans claim to be best suited to balance the budget, the last three Republican administrations (Reagan, Bush, and Bush) have all substantially increased the national deficit. To the contrary, Carter reduced it, and Clinton eliminated the debt and actually created a surplus. It's true that the Obama administration has ballooned the national deficit, but he had inherited the worst economy in 80 years, and only now can he start to reduce spending.

So there you have it. I should point out that I voted for Mitt Romney for governor. Back then, he was a socially progressive Republican, but now he is, in his own words, "severely conservative." It's almost like a contest to see which candidate can placate the extreme right wing of a party that already has limited prospects for 2012. I keep envisioning children arguing about who is most conservative ("Well I'm mega ultra severely conservative"). I should also refer you to the several discussions I've had with liberals who believe that Obama has turned his back on them, and how there is no difference between the two major parties.

I don't believe that any more than I believe that all Republican ideas are bad. It's just that somewhere in the last 30 years, the party took a wrong turn, ignoring what's best for America and focusing instead on what's good for me (whoever "me" might be). I dream of an America in which Santorum might say, "Mitt, that's a great idea," or Romney might admit that his foreign policy isn't much different from Obama's. Effective negotiation starts by recognizing areas of common ground, so why can't that principle be applied to politics? Of course, that goes both ways, and Democrats have to stop sniping as well. But in order for that to happen, Republicans have to adopt more realistic policies that are acceptable to most Americans, not just those who are "severely conservative."