I hear those same friends tell me that Bernie is polling better against Trump, and they are currently correct...in most polls against Trump, Bernie gets about 53% of the vote, while Hillary gets about 50% (in both cases, Trump gets about 39%). But here is the problem: nobody has attacked Bernie Sanders. The Republicans are avoiding attacking Sanders because they'd rather face him in the election, and Hillary has tread softly so as not to alienate his supporters.
Whereas Clinton has faced a lifetime of criticism about everything from Whitewater to her hips, Bernie has not. While Hillary has been repeatedly grilled about her roles in Benghazi and email messages, Bernie has gone unscathed.
If Bernie were to win the nomination, which is now highly unlikely, that would all change, and the Republicans would revel at the opportunity to expose Sanders's weaknesses, which include:
- He is a socialist. Does anyone really think that a majority of capitalist Americans will vote for a socialist?
- He has been in Congress (House and Senate) since 1991 and has never introduced a major piece of legislation.
- He has only been a Democrat since last year, after spending his entire professional career as an Independent. The Republicans would have a field day pointing out that the Democratic nominee is not really a Democrat.
- His policies (free tuition, tuition reimbursements, free healthcare, raising the minimum wage, expanding Social Security and Medicare) would cost an estimated $18 trillion (according to liberal economists), while his plans to cut tax loopholes and increase taxes on the wealthy would earn only about $6.5 trillion...when there is already a $19 trillion deficit. The Republicans would certainly do the math.
- He would be completely unable to work with the legislature. Forgetting about the Republican majority for a second, not one Democratic senator has supported his candidacy for president.
- His plans to break up the Wall Street banks and restructure our capitalist underpinnings sound great, but has anyone considered what they would do to the stock market after a Sanders election? You can bet the Republicans would trot out experts to predict another crash.
- He wants to eliminate the Import/Export Bank, which is the only thing keeping afloat companies like Boeing which have to compete against foreign entities that are heavily subsidized by their governments. This move alone could lead to a loss of hundred of thousands of jobs.
- He voted against the Brady Bill and several other gun control measures.
- He has been criticized by Democratic opponents (while he was an Independent) for nasty campaign tactics. To this day, former Vermont Governor Madeleine Kunin bemoans the things that Bernie said about her, some of which could be viewed as anti-feminist.
- Sanders has won a lot of Democratic contests in red states that are highly unlikely to vote blue in the general election. With the exceptions of Michigan and Wisconsin, the states that matter to Democrats in the general election have been largely won by Clinton.
- Bernie has won a lot of caucuses. However, voting in a caucus is much different than voting in a primary. Caucuses tend to be dominated by young people and zealots, whereas primaries are much more like the general election in terms of who votes and how they vote. As has been demonstrated, Hillary has a better shot of winning that type of vote.
- He would be sworn in at the age of 75. When 73-year-old John McCain ran for president, everyone said he was too old. How is this any different?
So, why is Bernie bad for America?
- His nomination would likely lead to a Trump presidency, for all the reasons I wrote above.
- By staying in the race and continuing to attack Hillary, he only increases the chances of a Trump presidency.
- A Trump presidency is bad for America.
If you're a Democrat or Independent in one of the states that has yet to vote, please vote for Hillary Clinton. Like her or not, she is a solid candidate, with a proven, tested record, and the best chance at preventing Donald Trump from becoming president.